Did a Church Close Food Bank Because it Attracted Poor People?

An image of a news story about a church closing its food bank "because it attracted poor people" can be seen circulating online. Is the story real or a hoax?

Sponsored links


The story is true, but it occurred back in 2000.

Let’s take a look at the original story:

A busy church food bank, known for offering warm drinks and snacks to its regulars, has announced it’s closing because it is attracting too many poor people.

“‘It’s attracting a lot of street people that made it uncomfortable,’ said Charlotte Prossen, Unity Truth Centre minister Thursday, ‘It’s creating social unrest in the church’

“A food bank is a social service and that is not who we are.”

Ms. Prossen said the program is being cancelled to focus on more church-specific activities. The church’s board of trustees made the decision to cancel the bimonthly food bank after receiving an e-mail from a sister church in Victoria.

“Most clients of food banks have not yet come to a sense of personal responsibility in life. They are still in denial, blame or seeing the world as owing them,” wrote Rev. David Durksen of the Unity Church of Victoria.

Ms. Prossen praised the work done by food banks, and said the church will still collect food for baskets but focus more on people’s spiritual hunger.

This image of a news article is being circulated with this story from 2000.

Surges in sharing of the story above peaked in August through September in 2011. It reappeared in heavy circulation in February 2013, and again in late January 2014.

The image above attributes this story to The Ottawa Citizen, but the article in the image does not appear to be archived online. There is, however, a follow-up story which can be verified from CBC News dated Feburary 21, 2000 in which the church defends its decision.

In this follow-up, we read that Ms. Prossen had only been the church’s minister for two months at that time, and that some in the congregation wanted the food bank to remain. She also denied the report that the bank was shut down due to “street people” but due to other situations which she did not describe.

Charlotte Prossen, who was hired out of the U.S. in 1999, has not been with the church since the year of this incident.

What do you think of this story?

 

Sponsored links




  • Timothy Campbell

    I can picture a situation where a church endeavors to help people who are in difficult circumstances and then finds that the project has escalated far beyond their ability to cope. They might still care about helping but in the absence of divine intervention they simply can’t handle the demand.

    In a way, this is comparable to what has happened to many commercial endeavors, wherein a company finds that it is so successful that it cannot keep up with demand. It tries to ramp up but quality suffers, workers get burned out, and the whole thing comes crashing down.

    Perhaps, at some time in the future, the same church will try again with a less ambitious project. I salute them for at least trying, even if they found that they couldn’t quite make it happen.

  • random

    Give all your belongings to the poor, unless it brings “street people.” This had obviously nothing to do with money as it did with being uncomfortable with the poor.

  • aPerson

    I got the feeling they were trying to bring their congregation together and non members started to show. They were doing it for spiritual reasons and the people that came only wanted the food. The thing that bothers me is how people look at them as in the wrong but it didn’t say they were turning people away, just shutting it down because it wasn’t the intended goal. At least they did feed them while it was going. They did a good thing, but quit for whatever reasons that are their own. How horrible!

  • anotherperson

    And thou shalt not glean thy vineyard, neither shalt thou gather [every] grape of thy vineyard; thou shalt leave them for the poor and stranger: I [am] the LORD your God. L 19 10

  • David

    …”A food bank is a social service, and thats not what we are here for.” Really?

    Luke 3:11. And [John the Baptist] would answer and say to them, “Let the man with two tunics share with him who has none, and let him who has food do likewise.”

    Or is the bible not a valid tool for showing the hypocrisy of this statement?

    • TINY HUGHES

      I agree David and our food bank at Church is for members and those walking the streets in need of food, we are looking for more of the community and less fortunate to come and not only our Church members, so something is wrong with this picture, just sad :(

  • foodpantry coordinator

    Matthew 25:35-40 is what we live by at our church and all our outreach ministries. Listen to Jesus:
    35 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:
    36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
    37 Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
    38 When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?
    39 Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
    40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

  • Red Molly

    Having tracked this down from a recent re-post to Facebook, I’m sure there is more to this story than what we’re able to glean from the two available articles; it seems as if the church was only providing the physical space for another organisation to run the food bank. This CAN present difficulties (e.g. the mention of insurance coverage; also, if they did/do not own the property, they could have issues with their landlord). The organisation for which I work runs a food bank on our property; we sometimes encounter issues with the surrounding shops and residents. I can understand not wanting to air dirty laundry, yet it seems an awful lot got made public that should have been addressed openly rather than the way it was — especially if any of it was taken out of context.

    I am, in fact, more curious about Rev Durksen than Rev Prossen. She obviously let herself be influenced by him, but I’m fairly certain their situations were hardly comparable. (Victoria vs Winnepeg? Seriously???) I’m also very suspicious that Rev Durksen is a flaming racist, inasmuch as a significant proportion of Victoria’s homeless are First Nations.

    Whilst Unity is by philosophy more spiritual than worldly, their stance of practicing the religion ‘OF Jesus Christ’ rather than ‘ABOUT Jesus Christ’ indicates they should understand that his ministry fed both soul AND body. It seems as if that was the case when they supported the food bank — not so much by the idea of focusing on ‘church-specific’ activities instead.

    Still and all, nice to see that the Winnepeg congregation apparently decided they were better off without leadership than with the kind they were getting. Hope their current ‘spiritual leader’ has achieved a balance.

    • waffles

      We agree that there is probably a lot more to the story we did not read.

  • Tammie Mills

    Who exactly did they want to help? If they only want to help those who will accept their beliefs then they are not really helping the poor, they are helping themselves. I can’t abide by that. If that’s the case they should have a big sign saying those who want to follow our (their)
    beliefs come in and be fed. My guess is they do that there could be some tax ramifications…hmmm.

  • Gary D.

    Sorry folks, we only want to do churchy stuff with our regular clientele. If you would like to apply to become one of us please join us on Sunday so that me may give you a thorough perusal. If you are accepted into our ranks then you will be welcome to dine with us.